Compare IVIP vs IGA · New category

The new category that changes the rules

IVIP (Identity Visibility & Intelligence Platform) emerged because IGA doesn't solve the modern identity problems: NHI explosion, real-time observability, AI-driven analysis, attack path mapping. Identity Rules brings native IVIP to your stack.

The modern · IVIP

IVIP

Unified identity visibility + intelligence

  • Primary purpose

    Continuous visibility + identity intelligence

  • Data model

    Real-time, continuous observability, event-driven

  • NHI coverage

    Native — service accounts, AI agents, tokens, workload identities

  • AI / analytics

    Behavior analytics, attack path mapping, ML-based anomaly detection

  • Deployment

    Days-weeks, SaaS or on-prem with same engine

  • Total cost (TCO)

    Monthly or annual subscription, fraction of enterprise cost

  • Primary use case

    Continuous visibility + threat context for SOC

The traditional · IGA

Traditional IGA

Provisioning + certification workflows

  • Primary purpose

    Provisioning + access certification

  • Data model

    Batch, periodic snapshots, request-driven

  • NHI coverage

    Limited or requires additional module

  • AI / analytics

    Static reports, predefined dashboards

  • Deployment

    6-18 month projects + ongoing consulting

  • Total cost (TCO)

    Expensive licenses + consulting + dedicated team

  • Primary use case

    Compliance reports + access reviews for GRC

Identity Rules combines ITDR + IVIP in one platform — the detection layer AND the visibility/intelligence layer in the same deployment, no parallel projects needed.

Book a demo